Skip to content

AI-era security operations center

CyberSecurityat the speed of AI

Twelve defense layers. Every automation earns trust fractionally. Every decision is auditable.

Defense layers
12
Automation trust model
Fractional
AI autonomy on high-impact actions
Zero

What we believe

01

Accuracy over efficiency.

If a feature improves throughput but introduces ambiguity about whether an alert was correctly handled, it does not ship. We protect critical infrastructure. The foremost metric is accuracy.

02

Multi-layered defense.

No single mechanism — AI or otherwise — is trusted alone. Every automated decision has a verification layer. Every verification layer has a human fallback.

03

Fractional deployment.

Nothing flips from off to on. Every new rule, filter, model, or automation ramps gradually, proves itself against historical data, and earns trust before it carries load.

04

Solve one problem at a time.

Each capability ships as a focused, complete solution to a specific operator pain point — not as a platform feature that requires three other features to be useful.

Today's headache

Three problems compounding into one crisis

The alert queue was already unsustainable. Coverage gaps keep widening. And the help on offer asks you to trust what you cannot inspect.

The queue

Alert fatigue is a staffing crisis

The problem

L1 analysts face thousands of alerts a day, roughly 12 minutes of manual triage each, and the vast majority are false positives. Analysts burn out clearing noise while real threats sit in the queue.

The IronSOC answer

AI-assisted filter authoring with fractional deployment and a rollback machine. Every filter earns trust against historical data before it carries production load — and rolls back automatically if accuracy degrades.

The blind spots

Coverage cannot keep pace with attack surface

The problem

Identity attacks account for 68.6% of threats (Expel 2025). Cloud breakout times have dropped to 48 minutes. Attack surfaces multiply faster than coverage grows, and every new tool is another silo with its own console.

The IronSOC answer

Twelve integrated defense layers — ITDR, CTEM, CNAPP, XDR, deception, and more — operating as one system with shared context, not twelve point tools with twelve dashboards.

The black box

You cannot audit what you cannot see

The problem

Every vendor claims AI triage. Almost none publish a benchmark, a held-out eval, or the model behind the decision. You are asked to trust a black box with your miss rate.

The IronSOC answer

We publish the coefficients, the benchmark, and a live API. Argue with our numbers — you can actually see them.

Try the product

Score an alert. Right here.

No demo call, no email gate, no scripted video. This console posts to the same live POST /api/triage endpoint a design partner pipes telemetry into — the model runs server-side and returns a decision with its full reasoning trace.

POST /api/triagemodel runs server-side · arbitrary alerts in, decisions out
Load sample:
0.40
0.30
0.40
0.30
0.40
0.30
0.30
0.20
no
0.50
Submit an alert to get a live decision and reasoning trace from the API.

Want the eval behind it — held-out benchmark, confusion matrix, zero-miss tuning? Inspect the full harness.

Watch the engine think

Three alerts. Three verdicts. Full reasoning shown.

These are not illustrations — each card below is scored by the production model as this page renders, at the zero-miss operating point (τ = 0.515). The bars are the actual per-signal contributions, in logit space.

The loud one

auto-contain

An agent retrieves a document carrying injection language, then reaches for a high-impact tool against sensitive data. Every signal pushes the same way.

Injection signal+2.39
Tool sensitivity+1.20
Instruction provenance+1.19
Behavioral deviation+0.94
σ(+4.36) = 0.987

Contained before an analyst is even paged — the tool call is held at the action layer.

The one that only looks scary

auto-close

Injection language, risky tooling — but inside a sanctioned red-team window. One strong negative signal collapses the whole score.

Approved context-2.09
Injection signal+2.08
Tool sensitivity+0.96
Data sensitivity+0.60
σ(-0.47) = 0.383

Closed without waking anyone. And 1 in 10 of these still gets re-read by a human — deterministically.

The quiet one

escalate to human

No single signal screams. A service account drifts off its learned baseline, touching slightly more sensitive data than it ever has. The combination is the tell.

Behavioral deviation+1.10
Tool sensitivity+1.04
Data sensitivity+0.83
Blast radius+0.66
σ(+1.60) = 0.833

This is the flicker that snowballs: a human gets it with full context and starts pulling the thread.

Every weight is published. Disagree with a verdict? Inspect the coefficients and re-run the eval.

Measured, not claimed

Numbers computed from the benchmark, live

These figures are recomputed from the 144-alert AgentSOC-Bench held-out split every time this page renders, at the zero-miss operating point. Synthetic benchmark today; customer eval sets run through the same harness unchanged.

56%
Alerts auto-closed
80 of 144 held-out alerts never reach an analyst
0
Missed threats
malicious alerts wrongly auto-closed at the operating point
100%
Threats caught
recall on the held-out split — every malicious alert escalated
100
Analyst hours saved
per 1,000 alerts at 12 min each — net of the 10% human audit trickle

Where every alert goes — the 90/10 routing

144
alerts in
held-out benchmark split
80
auto-closed
56% never page anyone
~8
re-read by humans
the 10% trickle — deterministic, not optional
64
escalated with context
evidence trace attached, human decides
0
malicious auto-closed
the number the threshold is tuned to hold at zero

Full methodology, model coefficients, and the interactive threshold explorer live on /proof. We publish customer-derived numbers only when a documented customer eval set stands behind them.

The twelve pillars

Everything a SOC needs, nothing it doesn't

Twelve capabilities organized around how operators actually work — from detection through response, exposure management through active defense. Each one ships as a complete solution to a specific problem.

Detect & Respond

Extended Detection & Response

Cross-layer detection across endpoint, network, email, cloud, and identity correlated in one timeline.

Identity Threat Detection

Behavioral baselining, impossible travel detection, privilege escalation tracking, and service account monitoring across every identity provider.

Detection Engineering & Validation

Version-controlled detections with automated breach simulation, MITRE ATT&CK and ATLAS mapping, and continuous validation.

Analyst Operations

AI-Assisted Filter Authoring

AI drafts suppression filters with retroactive simulation; analysts approve and deploy through Draft, Shadow, Partial, Active stages.

SOC Automation & Orchestration

Fractional-trust automation: enrichment auto, triage auto, low-risk response with 90/10 human audit, high-impact gating.

Autonomous Enrichment

AI fetches threat intel, CVE details, machine specs, and OSINT automatically — every source cited, every result timestamped.

Exposure & Posture

Continuous Threat Exposure Management

Five-phase exposure management — scope, discover, prioritize, validate, mobilize — operating upstream of detection to shrink the attack surface.

Cloud-Native Security Posture

Unified cloud security correlating posture, workload, identity, and data findings into exploitable attack paths.

Asset Context Map

Live profile of every asset: identity, function, baseline traffic, deviation indicators, and relationship graph.

Active Defense & Ecosystem

Virtual Lab & Deception

Sandbox for replaying incidents and testing detections; honeypots and canary tokens with near-zero false positive rates.

Bidirectional Integrations

Ingest from appliances and query back into them on demand for process trees, session details, and policy state.

Incident Contact Roster

Structured directory of ISPs, vendors, peer SOCs, and internal stakeholders, contextually linked to assets and incidents.

The operating loop

Six phases, every pillar working

01
Learn

Asset Context Map profiles your environment; CTEM scopes exposures; ITDR baselines every identity.

02
Watch

XDR correlates signals across layers; CNAPP monitors cloud posture; deception catches lateral movement with zero false positives.

03
Triage

AI-assisted filters clear noise through fractional deployment; autonomous enrichment adds context before humans see the alert.

04
Hunt

Detection engineering surfaces coverage gaps; bidirectional integrations pull full context from source appliances on demand.

05
Remediate

SOC automation handles low-risk containment with 90/10 audit; the contact roster connects responders to the right people instantly.

06
Harden

Post-incident findings feed back into CTEM scoping, detection rules, and filter tuning — the loop closes automatically.

Design doctrine

The rules that govern every feature

Accuracy over efficiency

If a feature improves throughput but introduces ambiguity about whether an alert was correctly handled, it does not ship.

Multi-layered defense

No single mechanism — AI or otherwise — is trusted alone. Every automated decision has a verification layer with a human fallback.

Fractional deployment

Nothing flips from off to on. Every rule, filter, model, and automation ramps gradually and earns trust before it carries load.

Solve one problem at a time

Each capability ships as a focused, complete solution to a specific operator pain point — not a platform feature requiring three others to be useful.

See IronSOC in action

Explore the interactive SOC — real-time threat detection, attack graph visualization, and response orchestration.

How engagement starts

Not a platform sale. A two-week decision.

You do not have to buy a SOC to find out whether we are any good. You buy a sprint — and keep everything it produces.

Step 01

AI red-team sprint

Fixed scope, fixed price, two to four weeks against your production agent surface. No platform install, no procurement marathon.

Step 02

Detections and filters, not a PDF

Every finding ships as a runtime detection plus a filter recommendation with rollback simulation, mapped to MITRE ATLAS and the OWASP LLM Top 10. Yours to keep either way.

Step 03

Continuous defense — if we earned it

Twelve defense pillars ramp fractionally onto your telemetry, each proving itself against historical data before it carries load. Baselines learn your actors, and 10% of every AI close stays human-audited. The flywheel spins on your data.

Design partners pay — a discount buys a reference and telemetry rights, never zero. Read the full engagement model.

Get started

Ready to see a different kind of SOC?

Test the triage engine, or talk to the founding team about a fixed-scope sprint against your agent surface.